Code
|
Project 21C policy objective
|
Existing mechanisms for achieving 21C
objective
|
[1]
Proposals from Project 21C policy workshops for new
mechanisms or changes to
existing ones
|
|
[3]
Impact of proposal on each non-advocating group,
modifications suggested by them, and responses from
advocating group.
|
|
[5]
Implementation strategy
|
[6]
Potential Champions
|
|
38
|
Increase investment
in agro-pastoralism at regional level.
|
|
Industry focused
infrastructure planning.
|
Ag/P
|
|
7
|
Lobby
NSW and Federal politicians for investment (I).
|
NSW Farmers’
Association; National Federation of Farmers, Local Government
|
|
39
|
Increase ability to
identify and evaluate new enterprises.
|
Rural Industries
R&D Corporation; NSW Agriculture; NSW Fisheries.
|
More R&D on
potential new species. Rebuild extension arm of NSW
Agriculture. Promote Fisheries extension. Include consultation
with landholders.
|
R
|
|
5
|
Lobby NSW
politicians for investment (M).
|
NSW Farmers’
Association, West 2000 Plus Board, in consultation with NSW
Agriculture, NSW Fisheries
|
|
40
|
Increase ability to
identify and evaluate new enterprises.
|
Access to World
Wide Web, and training support.
|
Courses made more
widely available. Grants for training, and to assist purchase
of equipment.
|
R
|
A: Aboriginal
people should have same access to Internet as Ag/P.
|
8
|
Lobby NSW
politicians for investment (M).
|
NSW Farmers’
Association, West 2000 Plus Board, in consultation with
communications and IT industries.
|
|
41
|
Increase investment
at property level.
|
|
Enhance perceptions
of security of tenure through Indigenous Land Use Agreements
under the Native Title Act. Co-ordination through the Cabinet
Office (NSW), with negotiation assistance from the Crown
Solicitors Office.
|
R
|
A: Desperate need
for recognition of pre-existing and continuing NT rights.
Abandon litigation and negotiate co-existence agreements.
Ag/P: response
ranges from strong support to strong opposition.
|
10
|
Develop
a regional strategy for ILUAs (I)
|
DLWC , Premiers’
Department, Aboriginal
elders, Murdi Paaki and Binaal Billa Regional Councils,
Minerals Council of NSW, West 2000 Plus are potential
champions. Coordination through Cabinet Office (NSW)
|
|
42
|
Increase profit
through technological change.
|
Increase water use
efficiency.
|
More irrigation
R&D on water use.
|
Ag/P
|
|
5
|
Lobby Grains
R&D Corporation, Land and Water Resources R&D
Corporation, Murray Darling Basin Commission, CSIRO Plant
Industries (I).
|
NSW Farmers
Association, National Farmers’ Federation.
|
|
43
|
Increase profit
through technological change.
|
Use of salt
tolerant species.
|
More Participative
R&D (ie land users and researchers work together).
|
Ag/P
|
|
5
|
See row 42.
|
See row 42..
|
|
44
|
Eliminate debt.
|
Property
amalgamation. Stamp duty already removed for some land trading
under WEST 2000, and intra-family transfers.
|
Increase (property)
amalgamation rate through grants to buyers. Remove stamp duty
from all transactions for amalgamation purposes.
|
Ag/P
|
|
7
|
Lobby
NSW politicians for changes in regulations (I).
|
NSW Farmers’
Association, in consultation with West 2000 Plus
|
|
45
|
Eliminate debt.
|
Selective purchase
of leases through Aboriginal Land Fund.
|
Activation of
Aboriginal Land Fund for selective purchase of leases.
|
R
|
|
3
|
Develop a Western
Division land purchasing strategy for the NSW Land Fund (I).
|
Aboriginal elders,
Murdi Paaki and
Binaal Billa Regional Councils, NSW Land Council, Local Land
Councils. West 2000 Plus a potential ally (Aboriginal table: row
12)
|
|
46
|
Eliminate debt.
|
Selective purchase
of leases by NPWS.
|
A higher rate of
selective purchase of leases by NPWS, and more selective
acquisition needed, so additional State funding required.
|
R
|
|
2
|
Link lease purchase
to NPWS reserve acquisition
strategy (I).
|
NPWS, West 2000
Plus.
|
|
47
|
Eliminate debt.
|
|
Debt paid in
exchange for a nature conservation agreement on selected
properties.
|
R
|
|
5
|
Develop a
“debt-for-nature swap” strategy (I).
|
Environment
Australia, Agriculture, Fisheries and Forestry Australia,
NPWS, conservation groups.
|
|
48
|
Increase profit
through diversification and reallocation of labour and capital
to give better returns.
|
Land use changes
|
Ease restrictions
on land use where land capability is sufficient.
Relevant NSW Acts including: Western Lands;
Environmental Planning and Assessment; Protection of the
Environment Administration; Fisheries
(as it affects aqua-culture); Clean Waters; Pollution
Control; Protection of the Environment Operations Act; Waters;
Water Administration; Native Vegetation Conservation;
Threatened Species Conservation; Wilderness; Heritage;
National Parks and Wildlife (heritage); Soil Conservation.
|
Ag/P
|
A: 0. No land use
change should be at the expense of Aboriginal people or
culture. Any
changes must acknowledge NT rights and Aboriginal
opportunities for development.
C: 0. Emphasis
should be on land capability studies. We prefer the option of
the new Natural Resources Act.
M: +2. Potential to
enhance access for exploration.
T: +2. Increases
options and flexibility.
|
8
|
Link development
approvals to land suitability (M).
Invest in land
resource surveys (I).
|
NSW Farmers’
Association, NSW Minerals Council, DLWC, NSW Agriculture,
Catchment Management Boards.
|
|
49
|
Increase profit
through diversification and reallocation of labour and capital
to give better returns.
|
Pastoral leases.
|
Alternative A:
Change pastoral leases to primary production leases that allow
cultivation, grazing, aqua-culture, horticulture, forestry,
tourism, and nature conservation. The leaseholder would be
expected to pay for the extra benefits conferred by the
change. The change should be subject to: regulations in the
environmental legislation, including granting of licenses; and
prior establishment of a regional Indigenous Land Use
Agreement (Native Title Act) that gives Aboriginal people
access to leasehold land.
|
R
|
A: Aboriginal
ownership of cultural and intellectual property must be
recognised and respected, and co-operative arrangements
entered into.
Ag/P: Rejected if
its only change of lease purpose. Freehold should be an option
for all leases, not just the agricultural ones.
Changes should be subject to NT resolution in the High
Court, or through an Indigenous Land Use Agreement.
C: +5. Support so
long as proposed activity linked to rigorous land capability
assessment.
M: +2 if mining
allowed. 0 if not. A primary production lease should allow
mining. Note that the Mining Act would in any case over-ride
the WLA or its
successor.
T: +1. Chance of
weaker planning controls than under freehold.
|
8
|
Change of lease conditions – option A (I).
|
Some pastoralists,
Aboriginal elders, Murdi Paaki
and Binaal Billa Regional Councils, Local Land
Councils, Conservation groups, Minerals Council, Tourism
Industry.
|
|
50
|
Increase profit
through diversification and reallocation of labour and capital
to give better returns
|
|
Alternative B:
Change pastoral leases to primary production leases that allow
cultivation, grazing, aquaculture, horticulture, forestry,
tourism, and nature conservation. The leaseholder would be
expected to pay for the extra benefits conferred by the
change. The change should be subject to regulations in the
environmental legislation, including granting of licenses.
|
R
|
A: Aboriginal
ownership of cultural and intellectual property must be
recognised and respected, and co-operative arrangements
entered into. Sui generis approach (based on own
customs and laws) to indigenous cultural and intellectual
rights.
Ag/P: Rejected if
its only change of lease purpose. Freehold should be an option
for all leases, not just the agricultural ones.
Changes should be subject to NT resolution in the High
Court, or through an Indigenous Land Use Agreement.
C: -2. Prefer
alternative A.
M: +2 if mining allowed. 0 if not. A primary production
lease should allow mining. Note that the Mining Act would in
any case over-ride the WLA or
its successor.
T: +1. Chance of
weaker planning controls.
|
10
|
Change of lease conditions – option B (I).
|
Some pastoralists
|
|
51
|
Increase profit
through diversification and reallocation of labour and capital
to give better returns.
|
Pastoral leases.
|
Alternative C:
Change pastoral leases to primary production leases that allow
cultivation, grazing, aquaculture, horticulture, forestry,
tourism, and nature conservation, The leaseholder would be
expected to pay for the extra benefits conferred by the
change.
|
R
|
A: Aboriginal
ownership of cultural and intellectual property must be
recognised and respected, and co-operative arrangements
entered into. Sui generis approach (based on own
customs and laws) to indigenous cultural and intellectual
rights.
Ag/P: Should
combine B and C. Still reject if its only change of lease
purpose. Freehold should be an option for all leases.
Changes should be subject to NT resolution in the High
Court, or through an Indigenous Land Use Agreement.
C: -5. Prefer
alternative A.
M: +2 if mining
allowed. 0 if not. A primary production lease should allow
mining. Note that the Mining Act would in any case over-ride
the WLA or its
successor.
T: +1. Chance of
weaker planning controls.
|
10
|
Change of lease conditions – option C (I).
|
Some pastoralists.
|
|
52
|
Increase profit
through diversification and reallocation of labour and capital
to give better returns.
Increase investment
at property level.
|
Pastoral leases.
|
Alternative D:
Extend freehold to ALL leases, with similar legal obligations
as freehold agricultural land in the rest of NSW. But NT must
be resolved before freeholding, change of lease purpose,
diversification or management for sustainability can occur.
|
Ag/P
|
A: -5. Freeholding extinguishes NT. Other avenues to be
explored – NT still exists; Aboriginal ownership of cultural
and intellectual property must be recognised and respected,
and co-operative arrangements entered into. Indigenous Land
Use Agreement processes are available.
Ag/P. Freeholding a
priority where there is a potential for intensive development.
C: -5. Should be
subject to sustainability of cropping and salinity assessment.
Prefer Primary Production Lease option.
M: +3. Would
simplify current approval process in some cases eg exploration
and small mines. Easier negotiation with owners because fewer
players involved.
T: +3. Increase
access to loans. Provides options for tourism, zoning and
protection
|
10
|
Freehold all leases
(M).
|
Agro-pastoralists,
NSW Farmers’ Association.
|
|
53
|
Increase profit
through diversification and reallocation of labour and capital
to give better returns.
|
Development
approval much slower in Western Division compared with
Victoria, so water is being traded across the border.
|
One-stop shop
approval mechanism.
|
Ag/P
|
|
10
|
Develop a one-stop
shop approval mechanism (M)
See Mining Table: row
141.
|
Agro-pastoralists,
NSW Farmers’ Association, minerals industry.
|
|
54
|
Increase profit
through diversification and reallocation of labour and capital
to give better returns.
|
Development
approval much slower in Western Division compared with
Victoria, so water is being traded across the border.
|
Alternative A: put
a time limit of 90 days for
permission to clear etc. Permission granted
automatically if time is exceeded.
|
Ag/P
|
A: -5.
Unacceptable. Shows misunderstanding of Statute of Limitation.
Ag/P: Lack of
professionalism in processing is a major problem. It could be
rectified.
C: -5. Patience is
a virtue.
M: 0.
T: -1. Potential
for clearing by default.
|
10
|
Put finite time
limit on development approvals – Option A (I)
|
Agro-pastoralists,
NSW Farmers’ Association.
|
|
55
|
Increase profit
through diversification and reallocation of labour and capital
to give better returns.
|
Development
control. Development approval much slower in Western Division
compared with Victoria, so water is being traded across the
border.
|
Alternative B: DLWC
pays financial compensation for every delay of one week after
90 days.
|
Ag/P
|
A: -5. No. Shows
misunderstanding of Statute of Limitation.
Ag/P: one view –
combine A and B.
|
10
|
Put finite time
limit on development approvals – Option B (I)
|
Agro-pastoralists,
NSW Farmers’ Association.
|
|
56
|
Increase profit
through diversification and reallocation of labour and capital
to give better returns.
|
Clearing and
cropping.
|
More Participative
R&D (ie land users and researchers work together) and
extension on sustainable cropping systems eg
establishment of pastures after cropping. Based on land
capability.
|
Ag/P
|
A: -5. No. Not
viable.
|
8
|
Lobby Grains
R&D Corporation, Land and Water Resources R&D
Corporation, CSIRO Sustainable Ecosystems (I).
|
Agro-pastoralists,
West 2000 Plus, NSW
Agriculture, DLWC.
|
|
57
|
Increase profit
through diversification and reallocation of labour and capital
to give better returns.
|
More cattle.
|
Increase extension
support for cattle industry where land is suitable.
|
Ag/P
|
A: -5. No.
|
2-8
|
Lobby State
politicians for rebuilding of NSW Agriculture’s extension
service (I).
|
Agro-pastoralists,
NSW Agriculture, West 2000 Plus.
|
|
58
|
Increase profit
through diversification and reallocation of labour and capital
to give better returns.
|
More meat sheep.
|
Increase extension
support for meat sheep industry. Sheep should have
21-28 micron wool, or finer.
|
Ag/P
|
A: -5. No.
|
4
|
Lobby State
politicians for rebuilding of NSW Agriculture’s extension
service (I).
|
Agro-pastoralists,
NSW Agriculture, West 2000 Plus.
|
|
59
|
Increase profit
through diversification and reallocation of labour and capital
to give better returns.
|
Landcare type
networks.
|
Form production and
conservation co-operatives relying on email and WWW for mutual
technical, marketing, purchasing and transport support. Need
start-up funds.
|
R
|
|
3
|
Lobby State
politicians for establishment support (I).
|
Agro-pastoralists,
NSW Agriculture, West 2000 Plus, Rural Industries Research and
Development Corporation.
|
|
60
|
Increase profit
through diversification and reallocation of labour and capital
to give better returns.
|
Goat farming.
|
Promote goat
farming. Participative R&D (ie land users and researchers
work together) for breeding (increase carcass size and
quality. Need start-up funds for fencing.
|
Ag/P
|
|
5
|
Lobby State
politicians for rebuilding of NSW Agriculture’s extension
service (I).
|
Agro-pastoralists,
NSW Agriculture, West 2000 Plus.
|
|
61
|
Increase profit
through diversification and reallocation of labour and capital
to give better returns.
|
Use of timber.
|
Give landholders
ownership of timber from their land. Change Forestry Act 1916;
|
Ag/P
|
|
5
|
Lobby State
politicians for amendments to Forestry Act and lease
conditions (M).
|
Agro-pastoralists.
|
|
62
|
Increase profit
through diversification and reallocation of labour and capital
to give better returns.
|
Smarter marketing
and purchasing through rapid communication to a wide
information network.
|
Universal Service
Obligation needs to be upgraded, legislated and clearly
defined to a level comparable to urban counterparts, and must
be flexible to accommodate technical change
|
Ag/P
M
|
A: +5. Improve
communications to Aboriginal communities through targeted
projects.
A/P: +5. Strongly
supported. More informed decision making and better marketing.
However, one view doubts urban standards can be achieved; the
emphasis should be upon keeping up with technology.
C: +5. This is the
most important initiative to us.
M: +2. Only a small
part of the overall consideration of a mining project.
T: +4.
|
8
|
Lobby federal
politicians and service providers (I).
|
Aboriginal,
agro-pastoral, conservation and tourism sectors, and West 2000
Plus.
|
|
63
|
Increase profit
through diversification and reallocation of labour and capital
to give better returns.
|
Smarter marketing
and purchasing.
|
More training in
marketing and improved marketing support schemes. Emphasis on
strategies for managing price risk. Encourage utilisation of
existing and new support schemes.
|
R
|
|
8
|
Lobby Agriculture,
Fisheries and Forestry Australia for training support (I).
|
Agro-pastoralists,
NSW Agriculture, West 2000 Plus.
|
|
64
|
Increase profit
through diversification and reallocation of labour and capital
to give better returns.
|
Improved roads
reduces transport costs.
|
Increased public
investment to improve roads and reduce transport costs.
|
Ag/P
|
A: +3. I).
Recognise NT and cultural heritage protection; ii). Improve
services to Aboriginal communities; iii). Involve Aboriginal
businesses.
|
8
|
Lobby
NSW and Federal politicians for investment funds (M).
|
Aboriginal groups, agro-pastoralists, minerals and tourism industries,
Premier’s Department, RTA, Local Government.
|
|
65
|
Increase profit
through diversification and reallocation of labour and capital
to give better returns.
|
Inducements for
on-farm nature conservation.
|
Sponsorship by
business and industry for on-farm nature conservation.
|
R
|
Ag/P: Valid in some
situations. How is this to be funded? Who qualifies?
|
8
|
Link to Worldwide
Fund for Nature, and NSW Conservation Trust initiatives for
funding on-farm conservation (L).
|
Conservation
groups, West 2000 Plus, some agro-pastoralists, some
industries, especially if it is favoured by taxation policy.
|
|
66
|
Increase profit
through diversification and reallocation of labour and capital
to give better returns.
|
Inducements for
on-farm conservation.
|
Stewardship
payments for on-farm conservation at a level competitive with
the most profitable land use on that land type. Stewardship
here means payment from public funds to a landholder to manage
land primarily for nature conservation. The payment would need
to exceed the gross margin of the next best land use option.
|
R
|
Ag/P: Valid in some
situations.
|
8
|
Establish pilot
stewardship scheme with West 2000 Plus and Agriculture
Forestry and Fisheries Australia (I).
See Conservation
tables:
row 87
row 120.
|
West 2000 Plus,
AFFA, NPWS, conservation groups (especially Worldwide Fund for
Nature), CSIRO Sustainable Ecosystems.
|
|
67
|
Build and share
knowledge.
|
Improved tele-communications
leads to smarter marketing and purchasing, on-line extension
support, knowledge of new enterprises, and sharing of
knowledge through networks.
|
Increase lobbying
pressure on federal Government and Telstra. Make telephone
improvement the first priority, followed by email capability,
with WWW capability the third priority.
|
Ag/P
|
A;: +5. Affirmative
action to direct targeted improvements into Aboriginal
communities.
C: +5. Endorse all
improvements to communications, including Internet.
M: +2.
T: +4. Safety,
bookings, information.
|
5
|
Lobby federal
politicians and service providers (I).
|
Aboriginal,
agro-pastoral, conservation and tourism sectors, and West 2000
Plus.
|
|
69
|
Improve services.
|
|
Bring primary and
secondary education to State standards.
|
Ag/P
|
M: +2. Enhance
skills of potential worksforce.
|
7
|
Lobby state and
federal politicians and service providers (I).
|
All sectors.
|
|
70
|
Improve services.
|
|
Enhance health,
police and other services.
|
Ag/P
|
C:+5. Equity in
health services across the community.
M: +3. Dangers of
our industry are real.
T: +2. Increased
safety for tourists.
|
8
|
Lobby state and
federal politicians and service providers (I).
|
All sectors.
|
|
71
|
Improve road
network.
|
Much of existing
road network is on leases.
|
Establish a legal
road network excised from leases, and maintained by the
shires. Unincorporated Area needs special consideration – at
present its roads are under the RTA.
Roads should be
fenced, and problems of trespass and legal liability for
lessees resolved. Establishment should be funded by the State,
not shires.
|
R
|
M: +3.
|
8
|
Lobby State
Minister for Agriculture, Land and Water, and DLWC (I).
|
All sectors.
|
|
72
|
Standardise leases.
|
Western Lands lease
conditions vary according to when the lease
was issued.
|
Standardise Western
Lands lease conditions.
|
R
|
Ag/P: This is
appropriate.
M: +2. Easier
negotiation.
|
8
|
Lobby State
Minister for Agriculture, Land and Water, and DLWC (I).
|
Agro-pastoralists.
|
|
73
|
Sustainable land
management.
|
Lease conditions
under Western Lands Act.
|
Western Lands Act
over-emphasises regulations and under-emphasises outcomes. For
this and other reasons replace with a new Natural Resources
Act (outlined above) that specifies lessee’s rights and
responsibilities, management outcomes for sustainability,
rights of access and resource use of other persons, and that
has provisions for Indigenous Land Use Agreements and
voluntary nature conservation agreements,
rents, sub-leasing, forfeiture, incentives, and
periodic changes of conditions.
|
R
|
A: +5. Support
development of an Act that fully respects Aboriginal
traditional rights and interests.
Ag/P: Mostly
disagree strongly, and say re-write the WLA, don’t pass a
new one.
C: +5.
M: -5 to +5.
Interests of the industry would have to be taken into full
account. Is there
really a need for a new Act?
T: +3 if in a
leasehold context. Increased focus on outcomes and ESD are
good for tourism. They provide more flexibility with adequate
controls.
|
8
|
Rewrite the Western
Lands Act to achieve these objectives without repealing the
Act (I).
|
Some
agro-pastoralists, the
conservation groups, the tourism industry, and perhaps the
Minerals Council.
|
|
74
|
Sustainable land
management.
|
|
Need a legal
requirement under the NPWA for NPWS to control all grazing
animals in National Parks for the benefit of neighbouring
properties. It would benefit the Parks as well as the
neighbours and the W Division.
|
Ag/P
|
A: must lead to
better land management. Involve Aboriginal people.
C: -5 as proposed.
Sound land management should apply to all land – control of
feral pests, scientific TGP management.
M: 0.
|
8
|
Lobby state
politicians for amendments to the NPW Act (I).
|
Some Aboriginal
peoples, some agro-pastoralists, West 2000 Plus, NSW
Farmers’ Association.
|
|
76
|
Sustainable land
management.
|
|
Need powers under
Noxious Weeds Act to declare quarantine areas.
|
Ag/P
|
|
4
|
Lobby State
Minister and NSW Agriculture (I).
|
Agro-pastoralists,
West 2000 Plus, NSW Farmers’ Association, National Famers’
Federation.
|
|
77
|
Sustainable land
management.
|
Reduce total
grazing pressure through rabbit control, kangaroo and goat
culling.
|
Develop control
strategies at Landcare, RLPB and W Division levels.
Kangaroo and goat harvesting not effective enough.
Conflicts between aims of meat production and reduction in
numbers.
|
R
|
A: +3. Respect
Aboriginal traditional hunting rights. Consider opportunities
for Aboriginal enterprises, and co-management.
Ag/P: Leaseholder
should be responsible. Shooters should negotiate arrangements
with landholders. Aboriginal co-management cannot proceed
until NT resolved. NPWS
to control numbers on their land.
|
7
|
Develop control
strategies at Landcare, RLPB and W Division levels (M).
|
NPWS, West 2000
Plus, NSW Farmers’ Association, Pastoralists’ Association
of the West Darling.
|
|
78
|
Sustainable land
management.
|
Reduce total
grazing pressure through commercial harvesting of kangaroos
and feral animals.
|
Promote viable wild
animal utilisation industries, including co-operation among
industries, agencies and conservationists. Conflicts between
aims of meat production and reduction in numbers (above).
|
R
|
A: Respect
Aboriginal NT rights and co-management, rather than commercial
harvesting. Harvest feral animals, not kangaroos.
Ag/P: NT not
resolved.
|
8
|
Simplify harvesting
regulations (I).
|
Kangaroo industry,
pastoralists.
|
|
80
|
Access to financial
advice and financial markets.
|
Banks, pastoral
houses, other lenders
|
Employ financial
advisers and counsellors with wide market knowledge.
|
Ag/P
|
A: +2. Culturally
appropriate services needed for Aboriginal people.
C: 0. Integrate
financial information with the social and economic environment
M: 0
T: +3. Free advice
is worth what you pay for it! Need for independence of advice.
This proposal assists diversification. Need to stress the need
for market knowledge in tourism, not just financial houses.
|
8
|
Lobby banks and
finance houses (I).
|
West 2000 Plus,
Pastoralists’ Association of the West Darling
|
|
81
|
Simplification of
grazing lease rental system
|
Rent on grazing
leases is currently based on sheep carrying capacity, even
when part of the lease is used for other purposes.
The present system is inequitable.
The large number of appeals is administratively
expensive.
|
Adopt the land
value approach used in the rest of NSW.
|
R
|
Ag/P: Retain and
improve the carrying capacity approach. Address inequities
though.
|
4
|
Continue lobbying
for the carrying capacity approach (I).
|
West 2000 Plus,
Western Lands Advisory Board, Pastoralists’ Association of
the West Darling.
|
|
82
|
Increase profit
through diversification and reallocation of labour and capital
to give better returns.
|
More aquaculture.
|
Provide extension
support for aquaculture to take advantage of
the new Class E yabby permit for extensive culture in
tanks on multiple properties per licence. Opportunities for
other types of aquaculture are expected with the new industry
initiative for the MD Basin.
|
R
|
|
3
|
Lobby NSW fisheries
and the Minister for extension services.
|
West 2000 Plus;
producer associations.
|
Notes against numbers in [#] below refer to numbers in the column
headings on the table.